Document from CIS Legislation database © 2003-2022 SojuzPravoInform LLC

NAME OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

SOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

of July 14, 1999

According to the petition of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company for recognition of Article unconstitutional and inappropriate to Item 2 7, to Item 3 of Article 15, to Items 3 and 4 of Article 79, to Item 3 of Article 84, to Item 2 of Article 88 and article 90 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic of the law-enforcement practice established by the resolution of judicial structure of supervising instance of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic of July 3, 1998 and not subject to execution of the decision of Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek of September 22, 1998 on case on the claim of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company to the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" about collection of 647605 som of the caused material damage

Constitutional court of the Kyrgyz Republic in structure: chairman vice-chairman Sutalinov A. A., judges - Dryzhaka P. N., Osmonova K.E., Satybekov S. S., Togoybayev Zh. Zh., Esenaliyeva K. E. and Esenkanova K. E.,

with participation of the court session secretary Kasymaliyev A. N.,

Having heard the report of the judge Esenaliyev K. E., speeches of representatives - "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company of Bezsmertny I. S. and Tananykina G. A., Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic of Tyurin V. I., having researched case papers, the Constitutional court of the Kyrgyz Republic

ESTABLISHED:

In the Constitutional court of the Kyrgyz Republic the petition of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company for recognition of Article unconstitutional and inappropriate to Item 2 7, to Item 3 of Article 15, to Items 3 and 4 of Article 79, to Item 3 of Article 84, to Item 2 of Article 88 and article 90 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic of the law-enforcement practice established by the resolution of judicial structure of supervising instance of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic of July 3, 1998 and not subject to execution of the decision of Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek of September 22, 1998 on case on the claim of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company to the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" about collection of 647605 som of the caused material damage arrived on April 13, 1999.

The "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company brings the following arguments into reasons for the requirements. The decision of Arbitration Court of Bishkek of February 23, 1998 from the settlement account of the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" for benefit of the State joint-stock company "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" exacts 647605 som of the caused material damage and 22952 som of the national duty.

The decision of Arbitration Court of Bishkek is left by the resolution of appellate instance of Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek of April 24, 1998 without change.

In judicial session representatives of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company Bezsmertny I. S. and Tananykina G. A., having supported the petition, ask it to satisfy.

Representative of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic Tyurin V. I., without having agreed with the petition, asks to leave it without satisfaction, and to stop the constitutional legal proceedings.

Constitutional court of the Kyrgyz Republic, having discussed arguments of the parties and having researched case papers, considers the petition subject to satisfaction on the following bases.

From the provided materials it is visible that the Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek the decision of February 23, 1998 satisfied claims of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company and collected in its advantage from the settlement account of the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" 647605 catfishes of the caused damage and 22952 som of the state fee.

The additional decision of February 23, 1998 the Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek collected from the settlement account of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company 8000 catfishes and from the settlement account of the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" of 8000 som for benefit of Republican research laboratory of judicial examinations for the carried-out expertize.

This decision of Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek is left by the resolution of appellate instance of Arbitration Court of the city of Bkshkeka of April 24, 1998 without change, and the petition for appeal - without satisfaction.

The judicial structure of supervising instance of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic the resolution of July 3, 1998 cancelled the decision and the additional decision of February 23, 1998 and the resolution of appellate instance of April 24, 1998 of Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek and case sent for new judicial review in arbitral vessels of the city of Bishkek in other list of judges.

The Arbitration Court of the city of Bishkek the decision of September 22, 1998 left claims of "Kantsky Cement and Slate Plant" public joint stock company to the State-owned joint stock company "Kyrgyzgazmunayzat" about collection of 647605 som of damage without satisfaction.

By Items 1 and 2 of article 79 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic it is determined that justice in the Kyrgyz Republic is performed only by court, and courts of the Kyrgyz Republic are the Constitutional court of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic and local courts (courts of areas, the city of Bishkek, areas, cities, Arbitration Courts of areas and the city of Bishkek, military courts). Creation and organization of emergency, special courts and positions of judges is not allowed. Therefore, the judicial structure of supervising instance of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic is not the constitutional judicial body.

The right of implementation of supervision of judicial activities of Arbitration Courts of areas and the city of Bishkek is provided by Item 3 of article 84 of the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic to the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Kyrgyz Republic, but not its judicial structure from three judges.

Warning!!!

This is not a full text of document! Document shown in Demo mode!

If you have active License, please Login, or get License for Full Access.

With Full access you can get: full text of document, original text of document in Russian, attachments (if exist) and see History and Statistics of your work.

Get License for Full Access Now

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info

Effectively work with search system

Database include more 50000 documents. You can find needed documents using search system. For effective work you can mix any on documents parameters: country, documents type, date range, teams or tags.
More about search system

Get help

If you cannot find the required document, or you do not know where to begin, go to Help section.

In this section, we’ve tried to describe in detail the features and capabilities of the system, as well as the most effective techniques for working with the database.

You also may open the section Frequently asked questions. This section provides answers to questions set by users.

Search engine created by SojuzPravoInform LLC. UI/UX design by Intelliants.