Document from CIS Legislation database © 2003-2025 SojuzPravoInform LLC

On behalf of the Russian Federation

RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

of July 3, 2019 No. 26-P

On the case of check of constitutionality of Articles 15, 16 and 1069 Civil codes of the Russian Federation, item 4 of Article 242.2 of the Budget code of the Russian Federation and part 10 of article 85 of the Federal law "About the General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-government in the Russian Federation" in connection with the claim of administration of the city district Verkhnyaya Pyshma

Constitutional court of the Russian Federation as a part of the Chairman V. D. Zorkin, K. V. Aranovsky's judges, A. I. Boytsova, N. S. Bondar, G. A. Gadzhiyev, Yu. M. Danilov, L. M. Zharkova, S. M. Kazantsev, S. D. Knyazev, A. N. Kokotov, L. O. Krasavchikova, S. P. Mavrin, N. V. Melnikov, Yu. D. Rudkin, O. S. Hokhryakova, V. G. Yaroslavtsev,

being guided by Article 125 (part 4) Constitutions of the Russian Federation, Item 3 parts one, parts three and the fourth Article 3, Article part one 21, Articles 36, 47.1, 74, 86, 96, 97 and 99 Federal constitutional Laws "About the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation",

considered in meeting without carrying out hearing case on check of constitutionality of Articles 15, of 16 and 1069 Civil Code of the Russian Federation, item 4 of Article 242.2 of the Budget code of the Russian Federation and part 10 of article 85 of the Federal law "About the General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-government in the Russian Federation".

Reason for consideration of the case was the claim of administration of the city district Verkhnyaya Pyshma. The basis to consideration of the case was the found uncertainty in question of whether there correspond the Constitutions of the Russian Federation disputed by the applicant of legislative provision.

Having heard the message of the judge-speaker S. M. Kazantsev, having researched the submitted documents and other materials, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

established:

1. The civil code of the Russian Federation provides opportunity to require full recovery of the losses caused to person whose right is violated in Article 15, in Article 16 assigns obligation to the Russian Federation, its appropriate subject or municipality to pay the damages caused to the citizen or the legal entity as a result of illegal actions (failure to act) of state bodies, local government bodies or their officials, including the edition contradicting the law or other legal act of the act of such body, and in Article 1069 establishes responsibility for the harm done by state bodies, local government bodies, their officials. In turn, the Budget code of the Russian Federation fixes procedure for the execution of court resolutions in claims to municipalities for indemnification caused to the citizen or the legal entity by illegal actions (failure to act) of local government bodies or their officials in item 4 of Article 242.2.

According to part 10 of article 85 of the Federal Law of October 6, 2003 No. 131-FZ "About the general principles of the organization of local self-government in the Russian Federation" local government bodies of again formed municipalities from date since which they start execution of powers according to part 5 of its Article 84, are legal successors of the bodies and officials of local self-government, other bodies and officials performing in the territories of these municipalities of power according to the solution of questions of local value based on legal acts of the Russian Federation, and the property obligations of local government bodies of again formed municipalities arising owing to legal succession are determined by the transfer (dividing) act.

1.1. Constitutionality of the called regulations is disputed by administration of the city district Verkhnyaya Pyshma.

As appears from the provided materials, the citizen S. G. Ryazanov appealed to the Kirov district court of the city of Yekaterinburg with the claim to PJSC Gazprom, Gazprom transgaz Ekaterinburg LLC and city district Verkhnyaya Pyshma on behalf of administration of this municipality about claiming damages, connected with need of demolition of the unauthorized constructions built by it in 1984 on the parcel of land provided for conducting gardening and located in the conservation zone of hazardous production facility - trunk gas pipeline. The decision of the called court of August 29, 2017 with which courts of higher instances agreed for benefit of the claimant from administration of the city district Verkhnyaya Pyshma exacts 3 615 749 rub 95 kopeks.

Warning!!!

This is not a full text of document! Document shown in Demo mode!

If you have active License, please Login, or get License for Full Access.

With Full access you can get: full text of document, original text of document in Russian, attachments (if exist) and see History and Statistics of your work.

Get License for Full Access Now

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info

Effectively work with search system

Database include more 50000 documents. You can find needed documents using search system. For effective work you can mix any on documents parameters: country, documents type, date range, teams or tags.
More about search system

Get help

If you cannot find the required document, or you do not know where to begin, go to Help section.

In this section, we’ve tried to describe in detail the features and capabilities of the system, as well as the most effective techniques for working with the database.

You also may open the section Frequently asked questions. This section provides answers to questions set by users.

Search engine created by SoyuzPravoInform LLC.