On behalf of the Russian Federation

RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

of April 17, 2018 No. 15-P

On the case of check of constitutionality of provisions of the subitem "an" of Item 2 of article 24 of the Federal law "About Conscription and Military Service" in connection with the claim of the citizen P. A. Spiridonov and request of the Bugulma city court of the Republic of Tatarstan

Constitutional court of the Russian Federation as a part of the Chairman V. D. Zorkin, K. V. Aranovsky's judges, A. I. Boytsova, G. A. Gadzhiyeva, Yu. M. Danilova, L. M. Zharkova, S. M. Kazantsev, S. D. Knyazev, A. N. Kokotov, L. O. Krasavchikova, N. V. Melnikov, Yu. D. Rudkin, V. G. Yaroslavtsev,

with participation of the representative of the Bugulma city court of the Republic of Tatarstan - the vice-chairman of the Bugulma city court of the Republic of Tatarstan Z. Sh. Bikmukhametova, the plenipotentiary of the State Duma in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation T. V. Kasayeva, the plenipotentiary of the Federation Council in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation A. A. Klishas, the plenipotentiary of the President of the Russian Federation in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation M. V. Krotov,

being guided by Article 125 (part 4) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, part one Items 3 and 3.1, parts three and the fourth Article 3, Article part one 21, Articles 36, of 74, of 86, of 96, of 97, of 99, of 101, 102 and 104 Federal constitutional laws "About the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation", considered case on check of constitutionality of provisions of the subitem "an" of Item 2 of article 24 of the Federal law "About Conscription and Military Service" in open session.

Reason for consideration of the case were the claim of the citizen P. A. Spiridonov and request of the Bugulma city court of the Republic of Tatarstan. The basis to consideration of the case was the found uncertainty in question of whether there correspond the Constitutions of the Russian Federation disputed by applicants of legislative provision.

As the claim of the citizen P. A. Spiridonov and request of the Bugulma city court of the Republic of Tatarstan concern the same subject, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, being guided by article 48 of the Federal constitutional Law "About the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation", connected cases on these addresses in one production.

Having heard the message of the judge-speaker Yu. D. Rudkin, explanation of agents of the parties, speeches of the representatives invited in meeting: from the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation - M. A. Melnikova, from the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation - T. A. Vasilyeva, having researched the submitted documents and other materials, including the conclusion of Russian President's Council for Civil Society and Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

established:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info